Inference-Time Scaling Advances for Flow Models

Inference-Time Scaling: New Possibilities for Flow Models

The world of generative AI models is in constant motion. While large language models (LLMs) and diffusion models have gained popularity through inference-time scaling, meaning the adjustment of computational effort during the inference process, flow models have lagged behind in this area. Inference-time scaling allows for improving the quality of generated results or better adapting the outputs to user preferences by employing additional computational power. A new research approach now promises to give flow models this flexibility as well.

The Challenge of the Deterministic Process

Diffusion models benefit from the stochastic nature of their intermediate steps during inference-time scaling. This stochasticity allows the use of particle sampling methods, which make scaling more efficient. Flow models, on the other hand, work with a deterministic generation process. Therefore, the efficient scaling methods of diffusion models cannot be directly transferred to flow models. This has so far been an obstacle to the application of inference-time scaling in this area.

Three Key Concepts for Scalable Flow Models

To enable inference-time scaling for flow models, the new research proposes three key concepts: First, SDE-based generation, which enables particle sampling in flow models. Second, the conversion of interpolants to expand the search space and increase the diversity of the generated samples. And third, Rollover Budget Forcing (RBF), an adaptive allocation of computational resources across different time steps to maximize budget utilization.

SDE-Based Generation and Interpolant Conversion

SDE-based generation allows the introduction of stochastic elements into the generation process of flow models. The use of variance-preserving (VP) interpolants in SDE-based generation shows particularly promising results. The conversion of interpolants expands the search space, leading to a greater diversity of generated samples.

Rollover Budget Forcing (RBF)

RBF optimizes the use of available computational resources by dynamically distributing the budget across different time steps. This enables more efficient scaling and improves the quality of the results. The combination of RBF with VP-SDE proves to be particularly effective and surpasses previous approaches for inference-time scaling in flow models.

Outlook

Research on inference-time scaling for flow models is still in its early stages, but the initial results are promising. The combination of SDE-based generation, interpolant conversion, and RBF opens up new possibilities for scaling and improving the performance of flow models. This could contribute to flow models playing an even more important role in the field of generative AI in the future. Especially for companies like Mindverse, which specialize in the development of AI solutions, this opens up new possibilities for optimizing existing and developing new applications, such as chatbots, voicebots, or AI search engines. The more efficient scaling of flow models could lead to more powerful and cost-effective solutions.

Bibliographie: Kim, J., Yoon, T., Hwang, J., & Sung, M. (2025). Inference-Time Scaling for Flow Models via Stochastic Generation and Rollover Budget Forcing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19385. KAIST-Visual-AI-Group. (n.d.). Flow-Inference-Time-Scaling. GitHub. Retrieved from https://github.com/KAIST-Visual-AI-Group/Flow-Inference-Time-Scaling CDC 2024. (n.d.). Conference program. Retrieved from https://css.paperplaza.net/conferences/conferences/CDC24/program/CDC24_ContentListWeb_3.html Bettini, C. (n.d.). State-Space. IEEE Control Systems Society. Retrieved from https://state-space.ieeecss.org/u/Bettini Alho, K., & Spencer, B. D. (2013). Statistical Demography and Forecasting. International Journal of Population Research and Management, 50(2). Retrieved from https://www.pm-research.com/content/iijpormgmt/50/2/local/complete-issue.pdf ThreeSR. (n.d.). Awesome-Inference-Time-Scaling. GitHub. Retrieved from https://github.com/ThreeSR/Awesome-Inference-Time-Scaling Ramsay, J. O., Hooker, G., Campbell, D., & Cao, J. (2007). Parameter estimation for differential equations: a generalized smoothing approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 69(5), 755-796. Azinovic, M., Gaegauf, L., & Scheidegger, S. (2022). Deep Equilibrium Nets Are Sensitive to Initialization Statistics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.06870. Borio, C. E. V., Furfine, C., & Lowe, P. (2001). Procyclicality of the financial system and financial stability: issues and policy options. BIS papers, 1(January 2001), 1-57. Saltelli, A., Guimarães Pereira, Â., Van der Sluijs, J. P., & Funtowicz, S. (2020). What do we learn from the practice of sensitivity analysis?. In SAMO 2019: Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output. Retrieved from http://www.andreasaltelli.eu/file/repository/Proceedings_SAMO_2019.pdf