The Progress in Logical Reasoning of Language Models: A Sober Look at Successes, Challenges, and Reproducibility

Language Models (LMs) have made remarkable progress in recent years, particularly in the area of logical reasoning. However, this rapid development has also led to a certain degree of methodological disorder. Evaluations are often based on benchmarking practices that lack transparency, robustness, and statistical soundness. This article highlights the current challenges in evaluating logical reasoning in LMs and presents solutions for improved reproducibility.

Uncertainties in Benchmarking

A central finding of current research is the high sensitivity of mathematical reasoning benchmarks to seemingly insignificant implementation details. Factors such as decoding parameters, random seeds, prompt formatting, and even hardware and software framework configurations can significantly influence performance. This makes it difficult to compare different models and interpret performance improvements. In many studies, these variables are not considered, which can lead to misleading conclusions.

Reviewing Current Methods: RL vs. SFT

The investigation of common methods for improving logical reasoning in LMs, such as Reinforcement Learning (RL) and Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT), reveals further challenges. Contrary to previous claims, RL approaches often show only moderate improvements and tend to overfit, especially with smaller benchmarks. SFT methods, on the other hand, demonstrate more consistent generalization ability. These results underscore the need for careful evaluation and a critical view of the actual progress.

The Path to Reproducibility

To ensure the comparability and reproducibility of research results, a standardized evaluation framework is essential. This should include clearly defined best practices and reporting standards. The transparent documentation of implementation details, the disclosure of code, prompts, and model results are crucial steps to enable the validation of research results and to create the foundation for future work. Such an approach promotes scientific exchange and accelerates progress in the field of logical reasoning of language models.

Outlook

The development of language models with improved logical reasoning capabilities is a promising field of research. However, to fully realize the potential of these models, a stronger focus on methodological rigor and reproducibility is required. The establishment of standardized evaluation procedures and the transparent documentation of research results are crucial to sustainably shape progress in this area and to promote the development of robust and reliable AI systems.

Bibliographie: Hochlehnert, A., Bhatnagar, H., Udandarao, V., Albanie, S., Prabhu, A., & Bethge, M. (2025). A Sober Look at Progress in Language Model Reasoning: Pitfalls and Paths to Reproducibility. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07086. ChatPaper. (2024). [Title of the Article]. Retrieved from [URL of the ChatPaper Article] International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). (2024). Conference Proceedings. Retrieved from [URL of the ICML Proceedings] [Author(s)]. (2024). [Title of the Article]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05812. Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). (2024). Conference Proceedings. Retrieved from [URL of the NeurIPS Proceedings] [Author(s)]. (2024). [Title of the Document]. Paris School of Economics. [Author(s)]. (2024). [Title of the Article]. Communications of the ACM. [Author(s)]. (2024). [Title of the Dataset]. Open Science Framework. [Author(s)]. (2024). [Title of the Article]. OpenReview. [Author(s)]. (2024). Reproducibility of multiword expressions. University of Bialystok.